inicio mail me! sindicaci;ón

Archive for July, 2007

A painful day for Apple Stock

Today Apple Inc.’s shares fell $8.81 to $134.89… which lopped off over $7 billion in market value for the company. Ouch!

Apparently AT&T’s iPhone numbers aren’t supporting the 500,000-ish numbers that were thrown around the first weekend that the iPhone was sold. AT&T is the exclusive service provider for the iPhone, and you can’t use most of its features if you don’t activate it. So one is lead to believe that AT&T would have pretty reliable numbers on the device.

Well, AT&T is saying that only146,000 phones were activated that weekend. Of course, there were some problems with activations, and some users couldn’t activate until after the weekend, and those figures aren’t reflected here. Still, the numbers look bad for Apple and the stock market has spoken.

Apple is going to give more information on iPhone numbers in its third-quarter earnings report expected tomorrow.

How cool do I feel that I had already sold all my shares near the 52-week high… and bought some back this afternoon at a bargain???

The iPhone has been hacked

A group called Security Evaluators hacked the iPhone with less than two weeks of part-time work, and has notified Apple of its vulnerabilities.

Here’s how easy they say it is to hack the iPhone:

  • A hacker takes over a wireless access point. User of iPhone comes into the area controlled by that access point, and comes under the control of the attacker.
  • User of iPhone goes to a website with a forum with improper security. Attacker posts a message on the forum that contains malicious code, and user of the iPhone is vulnerable upon accessing that message.
  • Attacker sends a link to an iPhone user, and the user goes to the linked page, which contains the malicious code.

Once an iPhone user is under control of the attacker, the attacker essentially has administrative privileges on the victim iPhone. They can read the address book, the call history, the voicemail, and the SMS messages. All information can be transmitted to the attacker. Passwords could also be sent.

Apple is not currently aware of any real-life compromises of iPhones, but the threat still exists.

5 years of Sarbanes-Oxley

That’s right. We are fast approaching the 5 year anniversary of the passing of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Who’s celebrating? Well surely the consultants and accountants who have made a fortune off SOX consulting are celebrating a bit.

Over at Audit Trail, they have some surprising results of a survey of public companies. The results are surprising to me because I generally believe that the cost of Sarbanes-Oxley has far outweighed the little benefit that has been gained. Yet executives apparently think SOX has been positive: [Read more...]

Dateline NBC investigates identity theft

Chris Hansen went undercover to investigate credit card fraud and identity theft, and the results were aired last night on Dateline NBC. The heart of the problem is people stealing credit card and banking information, selling it to people overseas, who eventually use the info illegally to buy merchandise such as electronics.

The story began in chat rooms, where people are actually brokering personal information. There are also certain “code words” that retailers can put on their websites, which let these thieves know that they accept stolen credit card numbers.

Information is usually obtained by a hacker who gets into the computer systems of large retailers, like TJMaxx. That company had the credit card information of 45 million customers stolen.

Hansen got a credit card issuer to issue valid credit card numbers to be used as part of the sting. Hansen then offered the “stolen” credit card numbers to online thieves, who used them to buy merchandise online. He tracked down the merchandise and started asking questions.

The number of people involved in this type of theft is staggering. Some are finding easy marks in the U.S. who will receive the goods bought with the stolen credit cards, and then ship them overseas. (Many retailers don’t ship overseas, so a U.S. connection is needed to facilitate the theft.)

Consumers are encouraged to take a look at this story. They need to know how easy it is for their banking information to be compromised. Cleaning up from identity theft and credit card fraud can be long and painful. The first step toward stopping this crime is awareness.

Interesting side note: If someone uses your credit card number illegally, that is credit card theft and not identity theft. Identity theft only occurs when someone uses your identity (poses as you) to illegally obtain a loan or credit card in your name. Consumers often confuse the two.

OxyContin abuse and addiction, and deceptive marketing

Whistleblower Law Blog has a post about OxyContin abuse and the Purdue Pharma sentencing. Executives of Purdue Pharma were sentenced to probation and community service in drug treatment programs for lying about the risk of addiction and abuse with OxyContin.

The blog also points us to a site run by Ed Bisch, a father who lost his 18-year-old son to death by overdose on OxyContin in 2001. Bisch’s site, www.Oxyabusekills.com, was started the day after his son died, and its goal is to let people know how addictive OxyContin is and how easy it is to overdose.

OxyContin is a strong and long-acting narcotic that was introduced to treat severe cancer pain. Yet shortly after it was approved by the FDA, critics started complaining about how strongly addicted users can become. Critics allege that Purdue was marketing this drug to non-expert doctors (ones who didn’t know how to prescribe it properly) and that they didn’t tell the doctors about the powerful high produced by the drug or the extremely addictive properties.

Executives eventually pleaded guilty to federal charges related to deceptive marketing, and the company paid a $634 million fine.

43rd Carnival of Fraud

Charles H. Green presents Credentials, Elitism and Web 2.0 posted at Trust Matters, saying, “How much does someone having credentials protect you from false information?” He also presents Linking Integrity and Success - CFOs and UBS , asking “s integrity integral to success? Or is that just something people say?”

Steven Silvers presents Despite the PR pundits, there’s not much to learn from the Whole Foods fiasco, commenting that “PR platitudes about reputation and ethics are mostly irrelevant to the melt-down caused by Whole Foods CEO John Mackey anonymously pumping his stock and flaming competitors on Internet investor boards. ”

Leon Gettler presents Burned up cooking the books posted at Sox First, saying, “Crime doesn’t pay. Well, for some. Contrary to claims that managers lie, cheat, cook the books and get away with it, a new study shows that individual perpetrators suffer huge consequences. Not all, but a lot of them.” He also presents Conrad Black’s bail and the hunt for his cash, and comments, “Fraudster Conrad Black has been let out on bail but confined to the US. Now his enemies have lodged lawsuits seeking more than $1 billion in damages. But chances are they won’t see the money, he has hidden it away.”

The ever-entertaining Wenchypoo presents Invasion of the Pod People, Round 2. This is a brilliant, brilliant analysis of all the stupid things we talk about and do because it makes people feel good… things like “Title 9″ for sports, protection of wetlands, universal health care, and global warming. I can only hope the lefties could read and understand!

And I’m still writing about Usana Health Sciences, the multi-level marketing company (read: pyramid scheme) that can’t seem to stay out of trouble or be truthful about the business model and financial statements. Last week they announced that their auditors, Grant Thornton, quit… and we’re supposed to believe this is actually a good thing!

Well, it’s official. I now delete more submissions than I actually publish. For the life of me, I can’t understand what starting a home based business, providing good customer service, selecting a CRM system, and such have to do with fraud and scams.

If you have a blog post related to scams, schemes, and fraud, please submit it for the next Carnival of Fraud.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin - Lawyer license suspension

SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
CASE NO.: 2006AP578-D
COMPLETE TITLE: In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Hazel J. Washington, Attorney at Law:

Office of Lawyer Regulation, Complainant, v. Hazel J. Washington, Respondent.
OPINION FILED: May 30, 2007

David R. Schanker
Clerk of Supreme Court
ATTORNEY disciplinary proceeding. Attorney’s license suspended.

¶1 PER CURIAM. We review the report and recommendation of the referee following the entry of a stipulation by the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) and Attorney Hazel J. Washington. As requested by the stipulation, the referee recommended that Attorney Washington’s license to practice law in Wisconsin be suspended for one year, effective February 3, 2006, the date on which Attorney Washington’s license was summarily suspended due to her criminal conviction.

¶2 On January 10, 2007, after reviewing the referee’s recommendation, this court issued an order directing the parties to show cause why the discipline to be imposed should not be an 18-month suspension. The OLR and Attorney Washington each filed a written response maintaining that the one-year suspension contemplated by their stipulation would be appropriate discipline. [Read more...]

Wisconsin Office of Laywer Regulation Public Reprimand With Consent

SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN - OFFICE OF LAWYER REGULATION
Public Reprimand With Consent 2007-OLR-10
Hazel J. Washington, Attorney at Law

Attorney Hazel J. Washington (“Washington”), a Wisconsin bar member since 1988, practiced law in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Washington’s law license was suspended at the time of the imposition of this reprimand. On November 3, 2003, Glenda Bailey retained Atty. Hazel J. Washington to represent Terranze C. Sharp (“Sharp”) who was sentenced on August 13, 1991, to life imprisonment for first degree intentional homicide. The initial retainer was for the purpose of reviewing trial transcripts and post-conviction matters in Sharp’s criminal case filed in Milwaukee County, State of Wisconsin vs. Terranze Curtis Sharp, Milwaukee County Case Number 1990CF904071. [Read more...]

The story of whistelblower David Welch

David Welch was the CFO of Cardinal Bancshares, and the first person to file a claim for whistleblower protection under Sarbanes-Oxley Section 806.

The Department of Labor ruled in his favor in regards to reinstatement to his job. But Cardinal refused to reinstate him and appealed to the highest level, and Welch’s case was ruled to have no merit.

Welch says that he raised concerns about the company’s accounting policies and internal controls, and then refused to certify Cardinal’s financial results. He says he was fired for this, but the bank says that he was fired instead because he refused to meet with an independent auditor and company lawyer without his own lawyer present.

The appeals board ruled that as the head of finance at Cardinal and as a CPA, Welch “could not have reasonably believed that Cardinal misstated its financial condition,” and therefore didn’t deserve protection under Sarbanes-Oxley.

Welch now intends to file his case in federal court.

Whistleblowers under Sarbanes-Oxley

A study of almost 1,000 whistleblower complaints filed under Sarbanes-Oxley has found that none has resulted in a “win” for the whistleblower. Section 806 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act is meant to give protection to employees of public companies who report wrongdoing. It is administered by the Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA).

Since its inception, 947 whistleblower cases have been filed. 665 cases were dismissed as having no merit, while 126 were withdrawn by the complainant. 138 were settled before the DOL ruled. Only 17 of the cases were deemed to be with merit by the DOL.

Of the cases that proceeded, only 6 cases survived the DOL’s first level of the appeal process, and none have been before the DOL’s Administrative Review Board, the highest appeal level.

Wow. This will surely make would-be whistleblowers think before they complain about wrongdoing at companies. Why risk one’s job and livelihood, when it is likely that the case will be dismissed or lost?

« Newer Posts · Older Posts »